首页> 外文OA文献 >Omnichannel Retail Operations with Buy-Online-and-Pick-up-in-Store
【2h】

Omnichannel Retail Operations with Buy-Online-and-Pick-up-in-Store

机译:全渠道零售业务,包括在线购买和店内提货

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many retailers have recently started to offer customers the option to buy online and pick up in store (BOPS). We study the impact of the BOPS initiative on store operations. We build a stylized model where a retailer operates both online and offline channels. Customers strategically make channel choices. The BOPS option affects customer choice in two ways: by providing real-time information about inventory availability and by reducing the hassle cost of shopping. We obtain three findings. First, not all products are well suited for in-store pickup; specifically, it may not be profitable to implement BOPS on products that sell well in stores. Second, BOPS enables retailers to reach new customers, but for existing customers, the shift from online fulfillment to store fulfillment may decrease profit margins when the latter is less cost effective. Finally, in a decentralized retail system where store and online channels are managed separately, BOPS revenue can be shared across channels to alleviate incentive conflicts; it is rarely efficient to allocate all the revenue to a single channel.
机译:最近,许多零售商开始为客户提供在线购买和实体店取货(BOPS)的选项。我们研究了BOPS计划对商店运营的影响。我们建立了一个程式化的模型,在该模型中,零售商同时经营在线和离线渠道。客户从战略上做出渠道选择。 BOPS选项通过两种方式影响客户的选择:通过提供有关库存可用性的实时信息,并减少购物的麻烦。我们得到三个发现。首先,并非所有产品都非常适合店内取货。特别是,对在商店中销售良好的产品实施BOPS可能并不有利。其次,BOPS使零售商能够吸引新客户,但对于现有客户,当后者的成本效益较低时,从在线履行到商店履行的转变可能会降低利润率。最后,在分散管理的零售系统中,商店和在线渠道是分开管理的,BOPS收入可以在各个渠道之间共享,以减轻激励冲突。将所有收入分配到单个渠道很少有效率。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gao, Fei; Su, Xuanming;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号